home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Frequently Asked Questions (FAQS);faqs.337
-
-
-
- Value Averaging adjusts the amount invested, up or down, to meet a
- prescribed target. An example should clarify: Suppose you are going
- to invest $200 per month and at the end of the first month, your $200
- has shrunk to $190. Then you add in $210 the next month, bringing the
- value to $400 (2*$200). Similarly, if the fund is worth $430 at the
- end of the second month, you only put in $170 to bring it up to the
- $600 target. What happens is that compared to dollar cost averaging,
- you put in more when prices are down, and less when prices are up.
-
- Dollar Cost Averaging takes advantage of the non-linearity of the 1/x
- curve (for those of you who are more mathematically inclined). Value
- Averaging just goes in a little deeper when the value is down (which
- implies that prices are down) and in a little less when value is up.
- An article in the American Association of Individual Investors showed
- via computer simulation that value averaging would outperform dollar-
- cost averaging about 95% of the time. "Outperform" is a rather vague
- term. As best as I remember, whatever the percentage gain of dollar-
- cost averaging versus buying 100% initially, value averaging would
- produce another 2 percent or so.
-
- Warning: Neither approach will bail you out of a declining market nor
- get you in on a bull market.
-
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Subject: Direct Investing and DRIPS
- From: BKOTTMANN@falcon.aamrl.wpafb.af.mil, das@impulse.ece.ucsb.edu,
- jsb@meaddata.com, murphy@rock.enet.dec.com
-
- DRIPS are an easy, low cost way of buying stocks. Various companies
- (lists are available through NAIC and some brokerages) allow you to
- purchase shares directly from the company. By buying directly, you
- avoid brokerage fees. However, you must nearly always purchase the
- first share through a broker or other conventional means; successive
- shares can then be bought directly. Shares can be purchased either
- through dividends or directly by sending in a check. Thus the two
- names for DRIP: Dividend/Direct Re-Investment Plan. The periodic
- purchase also allows you to automatically dollar-cost-average the
- purchase of the stock.
-
- The latest Money Magazine (Nov or Dec 92) reports that the brokerage
- house A.G. Edwards has a special commission rate for purchases of
- single shares. They charge a flat 16% of the share price, or about
- $6 for Disney.
-
- Published material on DRIPS:
- + _Guide to Dividend Reinvestment Plans_
- Lists over a one hundred companies that offer DRIP's. The number
- given for the company is 800-443-6900; the cost is $9.00 (charge to CC)
- and they will send you the DRIPs booklet and a copy of a newsletter
- called the Money Paper.
-
- + _Low cost/No cost investing_ (author forgotten)
- Lists about 300-400 companies that offer DRIPs.
-
- + _Buying Stocks Without a Broker_ by Charles B. Carlson.
- Lists 900 companies/closed end funds that offer DRIPS. Included is a
- profile of the company and some plan specifics. These are: if partial
- reinvestment of dividends are allowed, discounts on stock purchased
- with dividends, optional cash payment amount and frequency, fees,
- approximate number of shareholders in the plan.
-
- [ Compiler's note: It seems to me that a listing of the hundreds or
- more companies that offer DRIPS belongs in its own FAQ, and I will not
- reprint other people's copyrighted lists. Please don't send me lists
- of companies that offer DRIPS. ]
-
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Subject: Future and Present Value of Money
- From: lott@informatik.uni-kl.de
-
- This note explains briefly two concepts concerning the time-value-of-money,
- namely future and present value.
-
- * Future value is simply the sum to which a dollar amount invested today
- will grow given some appreciation rate. The formula for future value
- is the formula from Case 2 of present value (below), but solved for the
- future-sum rather than the present value. In this formulation, the
- appreciation rate is computed monthly.
-
- To compute the future value of a sum invested today, the formula is:
- fv = principal * (1 + (rrate / 100) / 12) ** (12 * termy)
- where
- principal = dollar value you have now
- termy = term, in years
- rrate = annual rate of return, in percent
-
- Example of calculating the future value of an invested sum:
- I invest 1,000 today at 10% for 10 years. The future value
- of this amount is 2707.04.
-
- * Present value is the value in today's dollars assigned to an amount of
- money in the future, based on some estimate of inflation and rate-of-return
- over the long-term. A reasonable estimate for long-term inflation is 4.5%.
- In this analysis, inflation is compounded yearly and rate-of-return is
- calculated based on monthly compounding.
-
- Two cases of present value are discussed next. Case 1 involves a single
- sum that stays invested over time. Case 2 involves a cash stream that is
- paid regularly over time (e.g., rent payments).
-
- Case 1: Present value of money invested over time. This tells you what a
- future sum is worth today, given some inflation rate over the time
- between now and the future. Another way to read this is that you
- must invest the present value today at the rate-of-return to have
- some future sum in some years from now (but this only considers the
- raw dollars, not the purchasing power).
-
- To compute the present value of an invested sum, the formula is:
- future-sum
- pv = --------------------------------------
- (1 + (rrate/100) / 12) ** (12 * termy)
- where
- future-sum = dollar value you want in termy years
- termy = term, in years
- rrate = annual rate of return on money that you can expect, in percent
-
- Example:
- In 30 years I will receive 1,000,000 (a gigabuck). What is
- that amount of money worth today (what is the buying power)
- assuming a rate of inflation of 4.5%? The answer is 259,895.65
-
- Example:
- I need to have 10,000 in 5 years. The present value of 10,000
- assuming a rate-of-return of 8% is 6712.10. I.e., 6712 will
- grow to 10k in 5 years at 8%.
-
- Case 2: Present value of a cash stream. This tells you the cost in
- today's dollars of money that you pay over time. Usually the
- payments that you make increase over the term. Basically, the
- money you pay in 10 years is worth less than that which you pay
- tomorrow, and this equation lets you compute just how much.
-
- To compute the present value of a cash stream, the formula is:
- month = 12*termy paymt * (1 + irate/100) ** int ((month - 1)/ 12)
- pv = SUM -------------------------------------------------
- month = 1 (1 + (rrate/100) / 12) ** (month - 1)
- where
- month = month number
- termy = term, in years
- paymt = monthly payment, in dollars
- irate = rate of inflation (increase in payment per year), in percent
- rrate = rate of return on money that you can expect, in percent
- int() function = keep integral part; used to compute yr nr from mo nr
-
- Example:
- You pay $500/month in rent over 10 years and estimate that inflation
- is 4.5% over the period (your payment increases with inflation.)
- Present value is 49,530.57
-
- I wrote two small C programs for computing future and present value; send
- email to lott@informatik.uni-kl.de if you are interested.
-
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Subject: How Can I Get Rich Really Quickly?
- From: jim@doink.b23b.ingr.com
-
- Take this with a lot of :-) 's.
-
- Legal methods:
- 1. Marry someone who is already rich.
- 2. Have a rich person die and will you their money.
- 3. Strike oil.
- 4. Discover gold.
- 5. Win the lottery.
-
- Illegal methods:
- 6. Rob a bank.
- 7. Blackmail someone who is rich.
- 8. Kidnap someone who is rich and get a big ransom.
- 9. Become a drug dealer.
-
- For completeness sakes:
- 10. "If you really want to make a lot of money, start your own religion."
- - L. Ron Hubbard
-
- Hubbard made that statement when he was just a science fiction writer in
- either the '30s or '40s. He later founded the Church of Scientology.
- I believe he also wrote Dianetics.
-
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Subject: Hedging
- From: nfs@princeton.edu
-
- Hedging is a way of reducing some of the risk involved in holding
- an investment. There are many different risks against which one can
- hedge and many different methods of hedging. When someone mentions
- hedging, think of insurance. A hedge is just a way of insuring an
- investment against risk.
-
- Consider a simple (perhaps the simplest) case. Much of the risk in
- holding any particular stock is market risk; i.e. if the market falls
- sharply, chances are that any particular stock will fall too. So if
- you own a stock with good prospects but you think the stock market in
- general is overpriced, you may be well advised to hedge your position.
-
- There are many ways of hedging against market risk. The simplest,
- but most expensive method, is to buy a put option for the stock you own.
- (It's most expensive because you're buying insurance not only against
- market risk but against the risk of the specific security as well.)
- You can buy a put option on the market (like an OEX put) which will
- cover general market declines. You can hedge by selling financial
- futures (e.g. the S&P 500 futures).
-
- In my opinion, the best (and cheapest) hedge is to sell short the
- stock of a competitor to the company whose stock you hold. For example,
- if you like Microsoft and think they will eat Borland's lunch, buy MSFT
- and short BORL. No matter which way the market as a whole goes, the
- offsetting positions hedge away the market risk. You make money as
- long as you're right about the relative competitive positions of the
- two companies, and it doesn't matter whether the market zooms or crashes.
-
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Subject: Investment Associations (AAII and NAIC)
- From: rajeeva@sco.com, dlaird@terapin.com
-
- AAII: American Association of Individual Investors
- 625 North Michigan Avenue
- Chicago, IL 60611
-
- A summary from their brochure: AAII believes that individuals would do
- better if they invest in "shadow" stocks which are not followed by
- institutional investor and avoid affects of program trading. They
- admit that most of their members are experienced investors with
- substantial amounts to invest, but they do have programs for newer
- investors also. Basically, they don't manage the member's money, they
- just provide information.
-
- They offer the AAII Journal 10 times a year, Individual Investor's guide
- to No-Load Mutual Funds annually, local chapter membership (about 50
- chapters), a year-end tax strategy guide, investment seminars and study
- programs at extra cost (reduced for members), and a computer user'
- newsletter for an extra $30. They also operate a free BBS.
-
- NAIC: National Association of Investors Corp.
- 1515 East Eleven Mile Road
- Royal Oak, MI 48067
- 1-313-543-0612
-
- The NAIC is a nonprofit organization operated by and for the benefit
- of member clubs. The Association has been in existence since the 1950's
- and has around 110,000 members.
-
- Membership costs $32.00 per year for an individual or $30 for a club
- and $9.00 per each club member. The membership provides the member
- with a monthly newsletter, details of your membership and information
- on how to start a investment club, how to analyze stocks, and how to
- keep records.
-
- In addition to the information provided, NAIC operates "Low-Cost
- Investment Plan", which allows members to invest in participating
- companies such as Disney, Kellogg, McDonald's, Mobil and Quaker Oats...
- Most don't incur a commission although some have a nominal fee ($3-$5).
-
- Of the 500 clubs surveyed in 1989, the average club had a compound
- annual growth rate of 10.8% compared with 10.6% for the S&P 500 stock
- index...It's average portfolio was worth $66,755.
-
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Subject: Life Insurance
- From: joec@is.morgan.com
-
- This is my standard reply to life insurance queries. And, I think many
- insurance agents will disagree with these comments.
-
- First of all, decide WHY you want insurance. Think of insurance as
- income-protection, i.e. if the insured passes away, the beneficiary
- receives the proceeds to offset that lost income. With that comment
- behind us, I would never buy insurance on kids, after all, they don't
- have income and they don't work. An agent might say to buy it on your
- kids while its cheap - run the numbers, the agent is usually wrong.
- And I am strongly against this on two counts. One, you are placing a
- bet that you kid will die and you are actually paying that bet in
- premiums. I can't bet my child will die. Two, it sounds plausible,
- but factor inflation in - it doesn't look so good. A policy of face
- amount of $10,000, at 4.5% inflation and 30 years later is like having
- $2,670 in today's dollars - it's NOT a lot of money. So don't plan on
- it being worth much in the future to your child as an investment.
-
- I have some doubts about insurance as investments - it might be a good
- idea but it certainly muddies the water.
-
- So you have decided you want insurance, i.e. to protect your family against
- your passing away prematurely, i.e. the loss of income you represent.
-
- Next decide how LONG you want insurance for. If you're around 60 years
- old, I doubt you want to get any at all. Your income stream is largely
- over and hopefully you have accumulated the assets you need anyway by now.
-
- If you are married and both work, its not clear you need insurance at
- all if you pass on. The spouse just keeps working UNLESS you need both
- incomes to support your lifestyle. Then you should have one policy on
- each of you.
-
- If you are single, its not clear you need it at all. You are not sup-
- porting anyone so no one cares if you pass on, at least financially.
-
- If you are married and the spouse is not working, then the breadwinner
- needs insurance UNLESS you are independently wealthy.
-
- If you are independently wealthy, you don't need it because you already
- have the money you need. You might want it for tax shelters but that is
- a very different topic.
-
- Suppose you have a 1 year old child, the wife stays home and the husband
- works. In that case, you might want 2 types of insurance: Whole life
- for the long haul, i.e. age 65, 70, etc., and Term until your child is
- off on his/her own. Once the child has left the stable, your need for
- insurance goes down since your responsibilities have diminished, i.e.
- fewer dependents, education finished, wedding expenses done, etc
-
- Do you have a mortgage? Perhaps you want some sort of Term during the
- duration of the mortgage - but remember that the mortgage balance
- declines over time. But don't buy mortgage insurance itself - much too
- expensive. Include it in the overall analysis of what insurance needs
- you might have.
-
- Now, how much insurance? One rule of thumb is 5x your annual income.
- What agents will ask you is 'Will your spouse go back to work if you
- pass away?' Many of us will think nobly and say NO. But its actually
- likely that your spouse will go back to work and good thing - otherwise
- your insurance needs would be much larger. After all, if the spouse
- stays home, your insurance must be large enough to be invested wisely to
- throw off enough return to live on. Assume you make $50,000 and the
- spouse doesn't work. You pass on. The Spouse needs to replace a
- portion of your income (not all of it since you won't be around to feed,
- wear clothes, drive an insured car, etc.). Lets assume the Spouse needs
- $40,000 to live on. Now that is BEFORE taxes. Lets say its $30,000 net
- to live on. $30,000 is the annual interest generated on a $600,000
- tax-free investment at 5% per year (i.e. munibonds). So this means you
- need $600,000 of face value insurance to protect your $50,000 current
- income.
-
- This is only one example of how to do it and income taxes, estate taxes
- can complicate it. But hopefully you get the idea.
-
- Which kind of insurance IMHO is a function of how long you need it for.
- I once did an analysis of TERM vs WHOLE LIFE and based on the assumptions
- at the time, WHOLE LIFE made more sense if I held the insurance more than
- about 20-23 years. But TERM was cheaper if I held it for a shorter period
- of time. How do you do the analysis and why does the agent want to meet
- you? Well, he/she will bring their fancy charts, tables of numbers and
- effectively snow you into thinking that the biggest, most expensive
- policy is the best for you over the long term. Translation: mucho
- commissions to the agent. Whole life is what agents make their money on
- due to commissions. The agents typically gets 1/2 of your first year's
- commissions as his pay. And he typically gets 10% of the next year's
- commissions and likewise through year 5. Ask him how he gets paid. If
- he won't tell you, ask him to leave.
-
- What I did was to take their numbers, review their assumptions (and
- corrected them when they were far-fetched) and did MY analysis. They
- hated that but they agreed my approach was correct. They will show you
- a 12% rate of return to predict the cash value flow. Ignore that - it
- makes them look too good and its not realistic. Ask him/her exactly what
- they plan to invest your premium money in to get 12%. How has it done in
- the last 5 years? 12? Use a number between 4.5% (for TBILL investments,
- ultra- conservative) and 10% (for growth stocks, more risky), but not
- definitely not 12%. I would try 8% and insist it be done that way.
-
- Ask each agent:
- 1)-what is the present value of the payment stream represented by my
- premiums, using a discount rate of 4.5% per year (That is the inflation
- average since 1940). This is what the policy costs you, in today's
- dollars. Its very much like paying that single number now instead of a
- series of payments over time.
- 2)-what is the present value of the the cash value earned (increasing
- at no more than 8% a year) and discounting it back to today at the same
- 4.5%. This is what you get for that money you just paid, in cash value,
- expressed in today's dollars, i.e. as if you got it today in the mail.
- 3)-What is the present value of the life insurance in force over that
- same period, discounted back to today by 4.5%, for inflation. That is
- the coverage in effect in today's dollars.
- 4)-Pick an end date for comparing these - I use age 60 and age 65.
-
- With the above in hand from various agents, you can see fairly quickly
- which is the better policy, i.e. which gives you the most for your money.
-
- By the way, inflation is slippery and sneaky. All too often we see
- $500,000 of insurance and it sounds great, but at 4.5% inflation and 30
- years from now, that $500,000 then is like $133,500 now - truly!
-
- Have the agent do your analysis, BUT you give him the rates to use, don't
- use his. Then you pick the policy that is the best value, i.e., you get
- more for your money. Factor in any tax angles as well. If the agent
- refuses to do this analysis for you, get rid of him/her.
-
- If the agent gets annoyed but cannot fault your analysis, then you have
- cleared the snow away and gotten to the truth. If they smile too much,
- you may have missed something. And that will cost you money.
-
- Never agree to any policy unless you understand all the numbers and all
- the terms. Never 'upgrade' policies by cashing in a whole life for
- another whole life. That just depletes your cash value, real cash
- available to you. And the agent gets to pocket that money, literally,
- through new commissions.
-
- Check out the insurer by going to the reference section of a big library.
- Ask for the AM BEST guide on insurance. Look up where the issuer stands
- relative to the competition.
-
- Agents will usually not mention TERM since they work on commission and
- get much more money for Whole Life than they do for term. Remember,
- figure the agents gets fully 1/2 of your 1st years premium payments and
- 10% or so for all the money you send in over the following 4 years. Ask
- them to tell you how they are paid- after all, its your money they are
- getting.
-
- Now why don't I like UNIVERSAL or VARIABLE? Mainly because with Whole
- Life and with TERM, you know exactly what you must pay because the issuer
- must manage the investments to generate the appropriate returns to
- provide you with the insurance (and with cash value if whole life).
- With UNIVERSAL and VARIABLE, it becomes YOU who must decide how and where
- to invest your premium income. If you guess badly, you will have to pay
- a higher premium to cover those bad decisions. The insurance companies
- invented UNIVERSAL and VARIABLE because interest rates went crazy in the
- early 80's and they lost money. Rather than taking that risk again, they
- offered these new policies to transfer that risk to you. Of course,
- UNIVERSAL and VARIABLE will be cheaper in the short term but BE CAREFUL -
- they can and often will increase later on.
-
- Okay, so what did I do? I bought both term and whole life. I plan to
- keep the term until my son graduates from college and he is on his own.
- That is about 11 years from now. I also bought whole life (NorthWest
- Mutual) which I plan to keep forever, so to speak. NWM is apparently
- the cheapest and best around according to A.M.BEST.
-
- Where do you buy term? Just buy the cheapest policy since you will tend
- to renew the policy once a year and you can change insurers as each time.
-
- Also: A hard thing to factor in is that one day you may become
- uninsurable just when you need it, i.e. heart attack, cancer and the like.
- I would look at getting cheap term insurance that is a bit more but then
- you can keep renewing, even if ill, or you can convert to whole life.
-
- Last thought. I'll bet you didn't you know that you are 3x more likely
- to become disabled during your working career than you to die during your
- working career. How is your short term disability insurance looking?
- Get a policy that has a waiting period before it kicks in. This will
- keep it cheaper. Look at the exclusions, if any.
-
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Compilation Copyright (c) 1992 by Christopher Lott, lott@informatik.uni-kl.de
- --
- Christopher Lott lott@informatik.uni-kl.de +49 (631) 205-3334, -3331 Fax
- Post: FB Informatik - Bau 57, Universitaet KL, W-6750 Kaiserslautern, Germany
- Xref: bloom-picayune.mit.edu misc.invest:33570 news.answers:4573
- Newsgroups: misc.invest,news.answers
- Path: bloom-picayune.mit.edu!enterpoop.mit.edu!ira.uka.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!stepsun.uni-kl.de!uklirb!bogner.informatik.uni-kl.de!lott
- From: lott@informatik.uni-kl.de (Christopher Lott)
- Subject: misc.invest FAQ on general investment topics (part 2 of 2)
- Message-ID: <invest-faq-p2_724309206@informatik.uni-kl.de>
- Followup-To: misc.invest
- Summary: Answers to frequently asked questions about investments.
- Should be read by anyone who wishes to post to misc.invest.
- Originator: lott@bogner.informatik.uni-kl.de
- Keywords: invest, stock, bond, money, faq
- Sender: news@uklirb.informatik.uni-kl.de (Unix-News-System)
- Supersedes: <invest-faq-p2_723127741@informatik.uni-kl.de>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: bogner.informatik.uni-kl.de
- Reply-To: lott@informatik.uni-kl.de
- Organization: University of Kaiserslautern, Germany
- References: <invest-faq-p1_724309206@informatik.uni-kl.de>
- Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 05:00:43 GMT
- Approved: news-answers-request@MIT.Edu
- Expires: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 05:00:06 GMT
- Lines: 1016
-
- Archive-name: investment-faq/general/part2
- Last-modified: Fri Dec 11 10:33:32 MET 1992
- Compiler: Christopher Lott, lott@informatik.uni-kl.de
-
- This is the general FAQ for misc.invest, part 2 of 2.
-
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR THIS PART
- Money-Supply Measures M1, M2, and M3
- Options on Stocks
- P/E Ratio
- Renting vs. buying a place to live
- Shorting Stocks
- Stock Index Types
- Stock Index - The Dow
- Stock Indexes - Others
- Stock Splits
- Ticker Tape Terminology
- Treasury Direct
- Uniform Gifts to Minors Act (UGMA)
- Warrants
- Zero-Coupon Bonds
-
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Subject: Money-Supply Measures M1, M2, and M3
- From: merritt@macro.bu.edu
-
- M1: Money that can be spent immediately. Includes cash, checking accounts,
- and NOW accounts.
-
- M2: M1 + assets invested for the short term. These assets include money-
- market accounts and money-market mutual funds.
-
- M3: M2 + big deposits. Big deposits include institutional money-market
- funds and agreements among banks.
-
- "Modern Money Mechanics," which explains M1, M2, and M3 in gory detail,
- is available free from:
- Public Information Center
- Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
- P.O. Box 834
- Chicago, Illinois 60690
-
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Subject: Options on Stocks
- From: ask@cbnews.cb.att.com
-
- First, an option is a contract between buyer and seller.
-
- The option is connected to something, such as a listed stock or an
- exchange index or futures contracts or real estate. For simplicity,
- I will discuss only options connected to listed stocks.
-
- The option is designated by:
- - Name of the associated stock
- - "strike price"
- - Expiration Date
-
- - The option costs a "premium" to buy, plus brokers commission.
-
- The two most popular types of options are Calls and Puts.
-
- Example: The Wall Street Journal might list an
- IBM Oct 90 Call @ $2.00
-
- Translation: This is a Call Option
-
- The company associated with it is IBM
- (See also the price of IBM stock on the NYSE)
-
- The option expires on the third Saturday
- following the third Friday of October, 1992.
- (an option is worthless and useless once it expires)
-
- The strike price is $90.00 If you own this option
- you can buy IBM @ $90.00, even if it is then trading on
- the NYSE @$100.00 (I should be so lucky!)
-
- If you want to buy the option it will cost you $2.00
- plus brokers commissions. If you want to sell
- the option you will get $2.00 less commissions.
-
- In general, options are written on blocks of 100s of shares. So when
- you buy "1" IBM Oct 90 Call @ $2.00 you actually are buying a contract
- to buy 100 shares of IBM @ $90 per share ($9,000) on or before the
- expiration date in October. You will pay $200 plus commission to buy
- the call.
-
- If you wish to exercise your option you call your broker and say you
- want to exercise your option. Your broker will arrange for the person
- who sold you your option ( a financial fiction: A computer matches up
- buyers with sellers in a magical way) to sell you 100 shares of IBM for
- $9,000 plus commission.
-
- If you instead wish to sell (sell=write) that option you instruct your
- broker that you wish to write 1 Call IBM Oct 90s, and the very next day
- your account will be credited with $200 less commission.
-
- If IBM does not reach $90 before the call expires, the option writer
- gets to keep that $200 (less commission) If the stock does reach above
- $90, you will probably be "called."
-
- If you are called you must deliver the stock. Your broker will sell
- your IBM stock for $9000 (and charge commission). If you owned the
- stock, that's OK. If you did not own the stock your broker will buy the
- stock at market price and immediately sell it at $9000. Commissions
- each way.
-
- If you write a Call option and own the stock that's called "Covered
- Call Writing." If you don't own the stock it's called "Naked Call
- Writing." It is quite risky to write naked calls, since the price of
- the stock could zoom up and you would have to buy it at the market price.
-
- My personal advice for new options people if to begin by writing
- covered call options for stocks currently trading below the strike
- price of the option (write out-of-the-money covered calls).
-
- When the strike price of a call is above the current market price of
- the associated stock, the call is "out of the money" and is "in
- the money" when the stock price is below the call's strike price.
-
- Most regular folks like you and me do not exercise our options; we
- trade them back, covering our original trade. Saves commissions and
- all that.
-